Within the video above, John Campbell, Ph.D., a retired nurse educator, opinions the proposed amendments to the 2005 Worldwide Well being Rules (IHR), which is the instrument that empowers the World Well being Group to declare a Public Well being Emergency of Worldwide Concern (PHEIC).
If these amendments undergo, nevertheless, the WHO will probably be empowered to do a complete lot greater than that. It’s going to change into the de facto governing physique of all member states, together with the U.S.
Now, in keeping with so-called “truth checkers,” the WHO may have no authority to dictate U.S. well being coverage underneath the amended IHR or the proposed pandemic treaty, nor will nations be stripped of their sovereignty.1 However they’re fully fallacious. The one motive they’re denying these truths is as a result of they don’t need the general public to strain authorities to reject these proposals, as they need to.
As famous by Campbell and others, together with bioweapons professional Francis Boyle, Ph.D., and researcher James Roguski,2 the pandemic treaty and the IHR amendments are clearly written by specialists in each nationwide and worldwide legislation and seem “hermetic.”
There’s merely little doubt that, as at present written, these devices will probably be legally binding and can supersede native and nationwide legal guidelines. They even embody enforcement instruments to make sure that member nations adjust to the WHO’s edicts.
One other false propaganda angle is that these devices solely apply to infectious illness pandemics, however that isn’t true both. Areas of life which are being added in underneath the umbrella of “well being” embody local weather, meals manufacturing and even poverty, so the WHO will be capable of declare sole international authority over something to do with these points as nicely.
In his video, Campbell goes by means of a number of of the proposed IHR amendments, and the way they’ll influence nationwide sovereignty and public well being selections. The article-by-article compilation of the proposed amendments3 may be discovered right here.
Strikethroughs within the textual content point out that the textual content is to be deleted, and the additions or revisions are underlined in daring. The next are among the most disconcerting amendments, copied with the deletions and insertions of textual content displaying.
New IHR Will Be Binding and Can Apply to Something
Article 1 Definitions — “‘standing advice’ means
non-bindingrecommendation issued by WHO for particular ongoing public well being dangers pursuant to Article 16 relating to acceptable well being measures for routine or periodic utility wanted to stop or cut back the worldwide unfold of illness and decrease interference with worldwide visitors;
‘momentary advice’ means
non-bindingrecommendation issued by WHO pursuant to Article 15 for utility on a time-limited, risk-specific foundation, in response to a public well being emergency of worldwide concern, in order to stop or cut back the worldwide unfold of illness and decrease interference with worldwide visitors.”
For the reason that phrase “non-binding” is eliminated, which means that any advice from the WHO will probably be binding and member states will probably be required to observe the WHO’s suggestions.
Article 2 Scope and Objective — “The aim and scope of those Rules are to stop, defend in opposition to, put together, management and supply a public well being response to the worldwide unfold of illnesss together with by means of well being programs readiness and resilience in methods which are commensurate with and restricted to
public well being danger
all dangers with a possible to influence public well being, and which keep away from pointless interference with worldwide visitors
andcommerce, livelihoods, human rights, and equitable entry to well being merchandise and well being care applied sciences and understand how.”
This actually opens the door for the WHO to take over for nearly any motive. It doesn’t even should be an actual public well being menace. It might be a possible, unproven or suspected menace.
Human Dignity, Rights and Freedoms Will Not Be Factored In
Article 3 Rules — “The implementation of those Rules shall be
with full respect for the dignity, human rights and elementary freedoms of individualsprimarily based on the rules of fairness, inclusivity, coherence and in accordance with their widespread however differentiated tasks of the States Events, taking into account their social and financial improvement.”
In different phrases, bodily autonomy and private selection are being changed by one-size-fits-all medication that has no regard for human dignity, human rights or elementary freedoms. The fitting to a lot as an opinion may even be eliminated on the nationwide degree.
Article 10 Verification — “If the State Occasion doesn’t settle for the provide of collaboration inside 48 hours , WHO
mightshall , when justified by the magnitude of the general public well being danger, instantly share with different States Events the knowledge out there to it, while encouraging the State Occasion to just accept the provide of collaboration by WHO, bearing in mind the views of the State Occasion involved.”
So, if the WHO suspects that an outbreak inside a nation would possibly pose a world menace, however the nation in query doesn’t need to collaborate with the WHO, the WHO will instantly inform the opposite members concerning the suspected menace, which is able to put strain on the uncooperative nation, and the views of that nation will probably be deemed irrelevant.
Different amendments inside this and different articles additionally particularly take away any involvement of the nation within the WHO’s decision-making. Article 13 beneath is however one instance. As famous by Campbell, the director-general is repeatedly specified as the only real authority in terms of making assessments and selections. The director-general may impose sanctions on nations that refuse to observe his dictates.4
How can a single individual be given the authority to make selections for your entire world? This sort of authoritarian top-down system can solely injury public well being, as public well being is finest served by native resolution makers which have entry to native information.
Director-Basic Can Act Unilaterally on Mere Suspicion
Article 12 Willpower of a Public Well being Emergency of Worldwide Concern, Public Well being Emergency of Regional Concern, or Intermediate Well being Alert — “If the Director-Basic considers, primarily based on an evaluation underneath these Rules, {that a} potential or precise public well being emergency of worldwide concern is going on, the Director-Basic shall notify all States Events and search to seek the advice of with the State Occasion in whose territory the occasion arises relating to this preliminary willpower …”
The important thing drawback right here is the addition of “potential or precise.” The WHO can take over if the director-general has a mere suspicion {that a} well being emergency is likely to be brewing. The menace doesn’t should be actual or evident.
Article 13 Public Well being Response — “
On the request of a State Occasion,WHO shallcollaboratearticulate clearly outlined help to a State Occasion provide help to a State Occasion within the response to public well being dangers and different occasions by offering technical steering , well being merchandise, applied sciences, know-how, deployment of civil medical personals, and help and by assessing the effectiveness of the management measures in place, together with the mobilization of worldwide groups of specialists for on-site help …”
Once more, enter from the member state won’t be accepted. It’s not about collaborating with the WHO on well being emergencies. It’s about obeying it. The WHO will independently determine what’s to be carried out. The WHO may additionally ship in its personal medical personnel to deal with the state of affairs.
Newly Added Articles
A number of new articles have additionally been added to flesh out and describe the WHO’s authority, and what member states should do to adjust to this new top-down order. Listed below are two telling ones.
NEW Article 13A WHO Led Worldwide Public Well being Response — “States [sic] Events acknowledge WHO because the steering and coordinating authority of worldwide public well being response throughout public well being Emergency of Worldwide Concern and undertake to observe WHO’s suggestions of their worldwide public well being response.”
In different phrases, member nations shall bow all the way down to the WHO and do as they’re instructed. A newly added Article 53 goes on to element how every member nation should implement a compliance committee to make sure the WHO’s directives are adhered to and executed.
New Article 13A Entry to Well being Merchandise, Applied sciences and Know-How for Public Well being Response — “1. Instantly after the willpower of a public well being emergency of worldwide concern underneath Article 12, the Director Basic shall make an instantaneous evaluation of availability and affordability of required well being merchandise and make suggestions, together with an allocation mechanism, to keep away from any potential shortages of well being merchandise and applied sciences …
3. States Events shall present, of their mental property legal guidelines and associated legal guidelines and rules, exemptions and limitations to the unique rights of mental property holders to facilitate the manufacture, export and import of the required well being merchandise, together with their supplies and parts.”
So, as soon as a PHEIC is introduced, the director-general will lay declare to all medical assets throughout the member states. Different additions additionally spell out that the WHO will management:5
|
The native manufacturing of well being merchandise |
Mental property |
|
Cell traces used within the manufacturing of biotherapeutics and vaccines |
Allocation of medical assets |
|
Biosurveillance |
Improvement of regulatory pointers for the fast-tracking of well being merchandise |
|
Censorship of “false and unreliable info” about public well being occasions, preventive methods and pandemic countermeasures |
A worldwide well being database (which is required for the implementation of vaccine passports) |
IHR Modification Greenlights Conflicts of Curiosity
The amendments additionally plainly enable for conflicts of curiosity which may hurt public well being. Below Article 9, the WHO can declare a public well being emergency primarily based on info from undisclosed sources. These sources might embody Large Pharma, WHO funders such because the Gates Basis and the Gates-founded-and-funded GAVI Alliance, or any variety of different gamers with conflicts of curiosity.
As reported by The Defender,6 “One of many largest modifications the WHO has seen in its 75-year historical past is a shift from funding from sovereign nations to funding from personal events.”
At current, nearly all of the WHO’s funding comes from Invoice Gates, by means of donations from the Invoice & Melinda Gates Basis, GAVI and the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Improvements (CEPI). Gates additionally funds the World Financial Discussion board, and his nonprofits are taking cash from drug corporations.
What this implies is that Gates and drug corporations wield monumental energy over the WHO. It’s not even near being unbiased. A majority of the WHO’s funding can be “specified,” which means it’s earmarked for specific packages. So, the WHO can not allocate these funds wherever they’re wanted most, and this additionally massively influences what the WHO does and the way it does it.
There’s no getting round this level: The WHO is a corporation that does no matter its funders need it to do, and that doesn’t bode nicely for international well being, contemplating medical errors are already a number one reason behind loss of life, and have been for many years. The IHR amendments mainly open the door huge to mass medical experimentation on humanity with out knowledgeable consent, and if the COVID pandemic is any indication, nothing good will come from that.
PHEIC Definition Expanded to Embody Simply About Something
The amendments additionally radically broaden the conditions that may represent a PHEIC. A PHEIC is at present outlined as an “extraordinary occasion” in a single nation that constitutes “a public well being danger to different states by means of the worldwide unfold of illness and to probably require a coordinated worldwide response.”
Amendments search to broaden and broaden this definition to incorporate issues like clusters of an infection with potential however unverified human-to-human transmission. The precise dangers of such clusters don’t even should be evaluated. What’s extra, the proposed definition of a PHEIC doesn’t specify that it should contain “extreme” or “life-threatening” illness, so it might be invoked for absolutely anything.
One of many amendments additionally suggests giving the director-general the flexibility to declare an “intermediate public well being alert” when the state of affairs doesn’t totally meet the PHEIC standards. In such an occasion, the director-general and/or a regional WHO director would be capable of declare a public well being emergency of regional concern (PHERC).7
As advised by Campbell, to actually perceive what they’re attempting to do right here, flick thru the Article by Article Compilation of Proposed Amendments8 for your self. Most undoubtedly, don’t imagine the “truth checkers” who say there’s nothing to see right here.
Treaty Will Broaden WHO’s Energy Past Pandemics
As talked about earlier, whenever you add within the proposed pandemic treaty, the WHO’s powers broaden even additional, as a result of along with increasing emergency powers throughout pandemics, the treaty additionally emphasizes the “One Well being”9,10 agenda, and that covers nearly all the pieces you possibly can consider.
As illustrated within the graphic11 beneath, the One Well being agenda relies on the premise {that a} broad vary of facets of life and the atmosphere can influence well being and subsequently fall underneath the “potential” to trigger hurt.
This graphic beneath isn’t complete. The scope of One Well being, in keeping with a One Well being Fee doc,12 additionally contains communications, economics, civil society, international commerce, commerce and safety, public coverage and regulation, analysis, noncommunicable ailments, agricultural land use (which entails forcing farmers off their land), catastrophe preparedness and response, illness surveillance, the “human-animal bond” (no matter meaning) and way more.
Below the brand new treaty, the WHO may have unilateral energy to make selections about all of those areas, and its dictates will supersede and overrule any and all native, state and federal legal guidelines. For instance, underneath One Well being, the WHO will be capable of declare local weather change as a well being emergency and implement local weather lockdowns to deal with it.
One Well being Is A part of The Nice Reset Agenda
One Well being mainly mirrors The Nice Reset agenda. It simply makes use of a unique identify and justifies all these Nice Reset modifications as a method to “defend well being.” Not surprisingly, One Well being is financed and promoted by an extended listing of Nice Reset backers, together with the United Nations, the European Union and varied U.S. federal businesses,13,14 the Invoice & Melinda Gates Basis, GAVI, the Wellcome Belief, UNICEF, CEPI, the World Financial Discussion board and the World Financial institution.
However whereas these entities are formally funding the pandemic business, what’s actually occurring is that they’re utilizing taxes to fund rich individuals, who in flip exploit the poor. It’s as removed from philanthropic as you will get.
Taxpayers are offering the cash whereas personal profiteers are deciding how that cash is spent, and it’s being spent in methods that may profit themselves. So, it’s a private-public “partnership” the place the general public is being robbed and all the advantages go to the personal sector.
As reported by Paraschiva Florescu and Rob Verkerk Ph.D., with the Alliance for Pure Well being Worldwide:15
“The One Well being method is aligned with WHO’s linear and reductionist pondering that seeks to distill all potential options to at least one view of the underlying science, one view on the required medicines, and just one fact.
This monolithic method spells grave risks for humanity provided that it’s bottom-up, decentralized, regionally particular approaches to complicated well being issues which have at all times been proven to work. Prime-down, “one dimension matches all” approaches, particularly ones twisted by conflicted pursuits, are doomed to failure.
Solely those that fail to take a look at the broader scientific image are ready to persuade themselves that the WHO’s first international try at managing a pandemic, involving masks, lockdowns and genetic vaccines, was successful.
At its core, the WHO’s prolonged powers will result in much more censorship and can dismantle the notion of consensus science constructed on a clear, scientific methodology …
With out a world rebellion by the grassroots, these amendments will go forward. Our silence and passivity are our consent. It’s, with out query, a part of the gradual descent into totalitarianism, taking us additional and additional away from rules and values which have characterised many civilizations over latest millennia, particularly the appropriate to liberty, the rights of the person, and the significance of nationwide sovereignty.”
To be taught extra, take a look at the Cease Vax Passports Activity Power webinar on One Well being,16 out there on NTD.com.
World Menace Detection Community Launched
Already, the WHO has launched a worldwide menace detection community, the Worldwide Pathogen Surveillance Community (IPSN), to “assist defend individuals from infectious illness threats by means of the facility of pathogen genomics.”17 Apparently, it totally expects to be granted all of the powers that the IHR amendments and the pandemic treaty will impart.
This community will probably be used to gather and analyze pathogenic samples, which in flip will drive the WHO’s public well being selections. As described in a press launch:18
“The IPSN, with a Secretariat hosted by the WHO Hub for Pandemic and Epidemic Intelligence, brings collectively specialists worldwide on the cutting-edge of genomics and information analytics, from governments, philanthropic foundations, multilateral organizations, civil society, academia and the personal sector.
All share a typical purpose: to detect and reply to illness threats earlier than they change into epidemics and pandemics, and to optimize routine illness surveillance …
COVID-19 highlighted the important position pathogen genomics performs in responding to pandemic threats. With out the fast sequencing of the SARS-COV-2 genome, vaccines wouldn’t have been as efficient, or have been made out there so rapidly.
New, extra transmissible variants of the virus wouldn’t have been as rapidly recognized. Genomics lies on the coronary heart of efficient epidemic and pandemic preparedness and response, in addition to a part of the continued surveillance of an unlimited vary of ailments, from foodborne ailments and influenza to tuberculosis and HIV.”
The issue, after all, is that the COVID “vaccines,” developed at warp pace utilizing genomic sequencing, had been neither efficient nor protected. Many have died inside two weeks of getting their jab, and after a number of months, the effectiveness change into unfavorable. That is the expertise they now need to use for all the pieces. The dangers shifting this agenda ahead are near-incomprehensible.
So, to summarize and recap, the globalist takeover hinges on the profitable creation of a suggestions loop of surveillance for virus variants, declaration of potential danger adopted by lockdowns and restrictions, adopted by mass vaccinating populations to “finish” the pandemic restrictions, adopted by extra surveillance and so forth. The funding for this scheme comes primarily from taxpayers, whereas the earnings go to companies and their buyers.
Present Timeline
As soon as the amendments are adopted by the World Well being Meeting, nations may have solely a restricted time to reject them. Any nation that hasn’t formally rejected the amendments will then be legally certain by them, and any try and reject them after the six-month grace interval will probably be null and void.
Because it at present stands, the IHR amendments will probably be voted on within the World Well being Meeting (WHA) in Might 2024. They solely want a majority vote to go. If that vote occurs as deliberate, then the 10-month deadline for member states to reject the amendments will expire in March 2025, and the amendments will come into drive in Might 2025. If a member state opts out, then the present 2005 IHR model will apply to that state.
The WHO pandemic treaty may even be voted on by the WHA in Might 2024. It requires a two-thirds majority vote to go, and 30 member international locations to ratify it. Thirty days after ratification, the treaty will take drive for the international locations that signed it.
Invoice Launched to Require Senate Approval, however Is It Sufficient?
Thankfully, the U.S. Senate shouldn’t be fully clueless concerning the ramifications of this treaty, and 17 Republican senators, led by Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., have launched a invoice to thwart the WHO’s energy seize.19
The “No WHO Pandemic Preparedness Treaty With out Senate Approval Act,”20 launched February 15, 2023, would require a Senate supermajority (two-thirds or 67 senators) to go the pandemic treaty.
Nonetheless, in keeping with Boyle,21 an professional on worldwide legal guidelines and treaties, even this invoice won’t be sufficient to guard us had been President Biden to signal the treaty. The explanation for it is because the treaty is written “particularly to avoid the Senate-approval course of.”
A much more efficient technique, he says, could be for Congress to withhold its annual contributions to the WHO — after which withdraw the U.S. from the WHO altogether.
I imagine it might be value supporting all of those methods. So, please, contact your representatives and urge them to help the “No WHO Pandemic Preparedness Treaty With out Senate Approval Act,” to withhold funding for the WHO and, finally, help U.S. withdrawal from the WHO.
